The politics around conflict diamond question

There is an awful lot of controversy surrounding the question of blood diamonds or conflict diamonds, and particularly the politics involved. Whether it’s a lot of money to be had, there invariably some political involvement, and this is particularly true in the case of the so-called blood diamonds. There been a number of measures put in place by various governments and “official,” bodies which are supposed to prevent the influx of these diamonds into the mainstream marketplace.

As far as we can tell, these measures have been completely ineffective, and many of the original founding members of the various bodies have walked away in disgust, stating only that the processes do not work, and we are firmly of the opinion, that mass of these measures – including the Kimberly process – were merely a sham, designed to squeeze an extra little piece of money from the cost of the diamonds in circulation.

Here are a couple of interesting articles written with the hope of educating people as to the truth of the situation:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_diamond
http://primestyle099.wordpress.com/2013/04/22/the-blood-diamond-controversy/

Obviously, it is important to make one’s own mind up when purchasing a diamond, but we’re reasonably certain it is never going to be possible to separate out the so-called “conflict diamonds,” from the mainstream supply. Any case – there is a very good argument, that many of the so-called mainstream diamonds are extracted in such a way as they may also be considered conflict diamonds. At the end of the day, a diamond is an inanimate object with no way of telling its own story. Diamonds continue to be in strong demand, and continue to hold their value, regardless of the politics surrounding them.We feel this is unlikely to change in the near future, and don’t have an alternative suggestion for dealing with the problem. It seems to us, that politicians around the world have become more and more greedy over the last few years, and we do not see any trustworthy ones anywhere.

 

European politicians are flaunting their wealth

We have noticed a disturbing trend in recent times, of European politicians flaunting their wealth in public, and generally demonstrating the fact that they are nothing like the “normal,” members of the public because they are busy spending money from the public purse. The recent G 20 summit in the South of France for example saw insane amounts of money being spent. A good example was the closing of the local interstates between the Nice airport, and the city center where the summit was being held, while politicians rode stretch limousines to their destination.

In order to achieve this closure, the French government imported 30,000 gendarmes to police the area around Cannes. No private boats were allowed to approach the beach, no private cars were allowed to enter the designated area, and the interstates were closed for hours at a time, with dozens of policemen stationed at every exit. It is difficult to gauge exactly how much money was spent, but seeing the world’s top politicians swanning around and acting like movie stars caused something of an uproar.

One of the politicians wives was seen flaunting her collection of pink sapphire rings at a table on the sea front of Cannes, and given the fact that members of the family were supposed to be staying at home and not have the vacation paid for out of the public purse, this also caused a bit of an uproar.

It is hard to know what to do, given the fact that the French government owns most of the media in France and there are very few independent newspapers or television stations left, so we tend to get the watered-down version of events spoonfed to us. Unlike the United States of course were similar situation is in place, only the media is owned by private individuals instead of the government, but they invariably have a vested interest.

Money on display

http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/02045/g20_2045867b.jpg

How waves in Europe rock the states

Picture of Rough Sea and Big Waves - Free Pictures - FreeFoto.com

The looming European financial crisis is causing a few tremors in the United States right now. If Greece, Italy, Spain and Ireland either collapse or leave the European Union, the United States is going to be hit hard.

Many U.S. banks have heavily invested in European government bonds. Defaulting on those bonds and the resulting loss could cripple some smaller institutions, much like Joe Public defaulting on a payday loan. Even the very largest US lenders will be hard pressed to absorb such losses without feeling it.

The hidden problem is U.S. financial institution assets. While the big lenders from North America may have cushioned their direct risks and exposures in Europe, they have much less control over their money in other investments.

How much of these secondary-level investments are directly linked to the ailing economies in Europe? Have these other investors also isolated their risk? What sorts of cushion do they have in place in case the markets tank? The answers to these questions may not be known unless a collapse happens and then it will be to late to mitigate the damage.

Beyond the direct monetary issues is trade. “For the United States the implications if not the magnitudes are clear – a major U.S. trading partner will be in a slump, and so U.S. exports to Europe will suffer,” said J.D. Foster, the Norman B. Ture Senior Fellow at The Heritage Foundation.

To be sure, each of the affected European countries is not a major trading partner. Since they all have a linked currency and a linked monetary policy, what affects one affects all. Europe as a whole is a major trading partner with the United States.

Mr. Foster notes if the U.S. economy was in good shape, a trading crisis could be weathered here easily. But as the American economy continues to drag, even a slight amount of downward pressure will be harsh.



As James Carville said during Bill Clinton’s run for president, “The economy, stupid.” American voters hold elected officials directly responsible for the state of the economy. Poor times translate into a turnover in Washington. Historically, the party in power tends to lose more than it gains when times are bad. For the coming U.S. elections, this does not bode well for the Democrats.

The Most Important Year In U.S. Politics?

File:Uncle Sam (pointing finger).jpg

2012…mark that year in you calendar as it is perhaps the most important year in U.S. politics that we will ever have.  This is what the politicians would have us believe, but this year they might just be right.  Here’s why…

In the U.S. we have been living “high on the hog” for quite a while.  The “chickens are coming home to roost” as they say.  It’s also “time to pay the piper” (they say that as well).

America is a land of plenty in many ways.  It has loads of natural resources and a huge population base.  The economy has had tremendous power over the years and this economic engine has been able to mask over many of the problems that America has today.  Here are a few of those problems…

For starters, the population of the United States is aging.  As more people retire there are fewer people to earn money and pay taxes to support this aging population.  It is basically as simple as that.  As people age they need more government services, such as health care, to take care of them.  Someone needs to pay for that, and if younger workers are not going to be able to do it we will need to find another source.



The rise of other nations is another serious problem here in the United States.  As other nations emerge into the economic mainstream they are in many ways able to provide goods and services at a much lower price than we can here in the United States.  This has caused many people to lose their jobs, then their health care, then their houses…and the list goes on.

Our reliance on other people’s oil.  In the United States we import a huge amount of oil from foreign countries, especially very politically volatile regions like the Middle East.  If this supply were to be cut off we would be in a very serious crisis.  We need our gas and oil to fuel our economy…so this supply of foreign crude must keep coming.

Yes, 2012 is a very important year in United States politics.  Will the current line-up of President and challengers be able to solve our problems once they are whisked into office?  Probably not…but they had better have a plan because we need it.  Like an oil tanker needing a 1/4 mile in order to turn around it is not always easy to solve these problems.  It will take time so we need to set a course for the right direction as soon as possible.  Not an easy job…I’ll stay in computer security thank you very much…

The American withdrawal from Iraq

I normally write about investing techniques and subjects such as a getresponse review but I would like to share my thoughts about some of the implications of the American withdrawal from Iraq. A little more than eight years after Iraq was supposedly liberated, America has announced the formal end to the war and withdrawn its troops. I find it telling that the ceremony announcing the end of American involvement had to be held behind fortified walls and kept brief to limit the possibility of attacks.

Not far from where the ceremony took place, there stands a refugee camp which undermines the American claim that Iraq is now stable and peaceful. Well over one million Iraqis live as refugees in their own country. Many of these people have been driven out of their homes by the war. Another one and half million Iraqis are living as refugees in neighboring countries mainly Syria and Jordan. It is also likely that the Iraqis in Syria will be forced to leave because of the unrest in that country.

Probably the most vulnerable sections of the Iraqi population are a considerable number of people [estimated at some 70,000] who worked for the American armed forces. These people were promised a safe refuge in the US but very little has been done to redeem this promise. Obama criticized the Bush administration on this count but has himself not achieved much. Congress approved a bill to issue 25,000 immigration visas but only about 3000 have actually been issued.

Most of the refugees in the camps are living in disgraceful conditions and lack sanitation, access to clean water and adequate medical facilities. The pity is that because these people are deemed to be illegal occupants, they are unable to obtain documents that would qualify them for employment or for welfare relief. Iraq is a country which has been torn apart by the war and its problems are far from over.

Republican presidential candidates for 2012

An unexpected surge in support for Newt Gingrich has turned him into the Republican front-runner according to a poll conducted by The Des Moines Register newspaper. The poll showed support from 25% of the likely attendees at the Republican caucus as compared to 7% in late October. The same poll showed Texas Representative Ron Paul and former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney second and third with 18% and 16% respectively. Minnesota Representative Michele Bachman and former pizza tycoon Herman Cain [who has now suspended its candidature], were in a tie at 8%.

Cain had led the poll in October but now the indications are that this is going to turn into a race between Gingrich and Romney. Gingrich has just opened an office for his campaign in Iowa and has hired staff including some who had previously left. His advisers admit that they are a little late in their preparations for the race but hope to catch up with their intensity and their intelligence. Romney has lost ground in Iowa because conservative voters dislike his support for abortion rights and health care reform.

However, Romney received a shot in the arm when the Sioux City Journal endorsed his candidacy. The paper described him as the best bet for creating a plan for strengthening the economy and restoring fiscal prudence in Washington. He is expected to return to Iowa shortly in his continuing effort to convince voters that he is the best alternative to Obama. However, it is clear that a majority of the Republicans who will participate in the caucus have an open mind about which candidate they will support.

Polls may not be as accurate and scientific as stock valuation but it is worth noting that in 2008, this very same poll forecast accurately that Obama would win the Democratic caucus while Mike Huckabee, the former Governor of Arkansas, would win the Republican caucus.

Trends in American Parties

By the mid-1970′s a number of major trends affecting American political parties could be discerned. Party procedures were more frequently being regulated by law, making party affairs less a private matter conducted by a few people and more a public process open to many people. The advent of the direct primary as a means of nominating party candidates in the early 20th century was a major earlier step in this direction. In later years, steps were taken to open the national convention delegate-selection process to greater numbers of voters.

Another trend reflects what is virtually a revolution in the kinds of campaign techniques political candidates and political parties use in seeking to win public office. In some areas party organizations, through door-to-door canvassing and other campaign activities, still may serve as an important conduit of political information between party candidates and potential voters for the party. But increasingly, extensive and expensive media campaigns (particularly on television) are the main technique that major candidates use to reach the voters. Here, as in several other areas, there has been an erosion of the Earties’ traditional function in American political fe.

Two other important tendencies are an increase in the role of issues in motivating American voters, and the greater role of ideology in American political behavior. Instead of relying on party loyalty, substantial numbers of voters seem to vote on the issues. Relatively fewer party workers seem to be motivated by an interest in tangible rewards, such as government patronage jobs; and relatively more party workers are motivated to political action by ideological concerns and issues. These trends may make it more difficult for parties to play their traditional role of broker among competing interests, thus facilitating accommodation and compromise, in the American political system.

Large interest groups now perform many functions that parties once performed in election campaigns. In 1968, for example, organized labor registered nearly 5 million voters, recruited almost 100,000 election-day workers, and distributed 115 million pamphlets and leaflets. Most of this activity was on behalf of Democratic candidates.

The strength of the voters’ adherence to the two major parties appears to be weakening. Between 1940 and 1974 the percentage of the electorate who called themselves independents rose from 20% to 33%. And in actual voting, widespread ticket splitting and crossing of party lines by many voters further reflects the independent spirit of the electorate. This weakening of the stabilizing effect of party identification could make American politics more fluid and unpredictable- making possible wide swings from one party to the other in future presidential elections.

These trends should not be construed as signaling the end of American parties. Political parties continue to exist and have considerable vitality in some parts of the country. Most candidates who seek public office would rather run as the nominees of a major party than as independents seeking office on their own. Nevertheless, these trends do mean that the parties increasingly have had to share some of their traditional functions with other politically oriented groups, and it will probably be more difficult for the parties to play the brokerage role they traditionally have tried to assume in American political hierarchy.

Michelle Obama’s Choice For Decorations

Michelle Obama has been referred to as the first lady who is most like Jaqueline Onassis on quite a few different occasions.  From the way that she carries herself, to how she dresses, interacts with other people, and even how she chooses to decorate their private home.

When it comes to the outdoor areas around Michelle and Barack’s home she tends to use more of the faux wood blinds, and other similar styles.  The faux wood helps prevent them from showing their age too quickly, and allows for the blinds to be easily cleaned.  Having them around the pool area and in the sun room makes the rest of the decor pop.

Michelle also loves to use real wood bamboo blinds for the interior of the home, in areas where the windows allow more light to come through.  Michelle and Barack love the look and feel of tropical, lush settings and having natural bamboo wood in the home helps them achieve the look that they are going for.  Bamboo wood blinds are incredibly easy to clean, giving the housemaids less to do when there is dust and pollen in the air. 

When it comes to putting together a high class decor, Michelle Obama loves real wood bamboo and faux wood blinds.

Stepping-stone to the Presidency

Being Vice-President has not proved to be a good way to be elected President. Governors, Senators, and military heroes have a better chance of being elected President than do Vice-Presidents. John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, Martin Van Buren, and Richard M. Nixon were the only ones to be elected to the Presidency while serving or after having served as Vice-President, and both Jefferson and Adams were chosen Vice-President before the 12th Amendment went into effect. John C. Breckenridge in 1860 and Hubert H. Humphrey in 1968 complete the list of Vice-Presidents who have been candidates for President.

“Accidental” Presidents

John Tyler was the first Vice-President to assume the Presidency on the death of the President. He came to power in 1841, when President William Henry Harrison died in office. Whig politicians disputed Tyler’s right to assume all the powers of the Presidency for the duration of Harrison’s unexpired term. They considered him to be merely the acting President and called him “His Accidency.”

Tyler courageously resisted the attempts to deny him full Presidential powers and successfully completed Harrison’s term as President. Since Tyler, no one has ever denied the right of a Vice-President to the full powers of the Presidency on the President’s death.

Besides Tyler, the other Vice-Presidents who became “accidental” Presidents were Millard Fillmore, Andrew Johnson, Chester Alan Arthur, Theodore Roosevelt, Calvin Coolidge, Harry S. Truman, Lyndon Baines Johnson, and Gerald R. Ford. Because of the haphazard way in which Vice-Presidents have been selected, only Lyndon Johnson, of these nine men, was considered to be Presidential material at the time of his nomination to the Vice-Presidency. However, Lyndon Johnson, Roosevelt, Coolidge, and Truman each went on to win a full term as President on his own.

The Politics of Malaria

According to research carried out by the World Health Organisation, every year the planet Earth sees one million people die of malaria.  The vast, vast majority of these deaths occur in the developing world, with only a few thousand in the developed world. 

For those of us who live in the west this is a tremendously comforting statistic.  Western healthcare is fantastic, and we can usually rely on our local hospitals to protect us from the worst the world can throw at us.  However, there are many ways in which the politics of the western world can leave us in the west at a disadvantage.

Let me tell you a story.  About ten years ago my older brother spent six months teaching English in a small school near Bangalore, India.  About half way through the trip he contracted malaria and nearly died.  He was found unconscious in a railway bathroom, taken to hospital by a kind stranger and cared for until he began to improve. 

Now, Indian hospitals are poor, deprived places.  Compared to the west the hospitals are poorly funded, but the thing is that they are geared up to treat such diseases as malaria.  Back in the west we’re clueless.  When my brother was returned to a hospital in the UK to recover he was placed in an overcrowded ward and treated by doctors who may never have seen a case of malaria before.  

Fortunately my brother survived, and today he’s a lot more careful about learning how to treat mosquito bites and using his electronic bug repellent when he’s abroad.  If he ever gets malaria again, though, I’d advise him to stay overseas to be treated.